– updated August, 2026
Seeking more reinforces belief in more than one. But there’s no more than that which is One, as it’s formless and thus endless.
With its many unexplored territories, the online world often seems more exciting than the physical world. Likewise, the physical world, with its tangible options and differences, may feel more thrilling than the formlessness of Oneness. It has nothing to choose but that which is One. Thankfully, if you don’t seek more, the differences you perceive in either the online or offline world make no difference. Thus, Oneness, being undivided, is unveiled as ever-tranquillising, since there is no conflict or choice.
Duality Hack #1.7 from the free eBook Alexius’ Duality Hacks
If you need time to process Alexius’ Duality Hacks, you consent to believe in more than One, because processing something requires division into more than one.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
You can only be conscious of something when you believe you are separate from it. That is why awareness of something entails suffering.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
You will never know what’s genuine because reality is Oneness, and it takes more than one to recognise it, so knowing it remains impossible.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
Some individuals combine selected pieces of realisation to construct a state of oneness. But you can’t create Oneness, as it requires more than one.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
Since it takes more than one to lose something, and reality is that which is One, you can’t lose anything real.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
Even though most believe in a world with more than one, they act as if there is no one else but themselves.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
From the perspective of a world with more than one, the formlessness of Oneness can seem dull. Yet in a world with more than one, we must always seek more to uphold the belief in more than One. By contrast, Oneness is a perpetual present, free from constant change and the need for more. [Image from the internet]
Because most people are weary from constantly pursuing more, they seek more relaxation to regain the energy needed to pursue more love, peace, authenticity, friends, money, power, and whatnot. Above all, they want greater control so they can manipulate more people into giving them more.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
When a drug addict has completed rehab, the reward is freedom from addiction, not a new and better high. Similarly, when you do not relentlessly pursue more, the reward is not a stimulating experience of something higher but the bliss of nothing.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
The only thing that appears more futile than not getting what we desire is to obtain it, only to find that the hunger for more brings no satisfaction because there’s no more than that which is One.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
A world with more than one rests on the idea that there’s more than that which is One. That’s why our instinct tells us we must get more to solve problems. However, our quest for more is futile because Oneness is formless, thus endless, so there is no more than that which is One.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
If you’re indifferent to how possibilities in a world with more than one unfold, all those options eventually collapse into that which is One.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
What you know about Oneness is wrong because understanding requires comparing or relating more than one. Therefore, looking forward to experiencing Oneness is mad, since it would require a division that Oneness lacks. Thankfully, the hope for more disappears if you look forward to not believing in a world with more than one. [Photo: Alexius]
When you accept your appearance as one among many in a world with more than one, you honour your choice to believe in more than one. Ergo, you’re in a position to undo this choice. Fortunately, since time is an illusion, you’re not in a hurry. Thus, you can revel in the experience of being and having more than one until this experience, like anything else with a beginning and an end, naturally ends without any effort on your part.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
It’s impossible to choose that which is One, because that involves more than one. Fortunately, if you stop believing the stories about more, the perception of separation dissolves, leaving nothing to choose.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
If you believe in more than one, Oneness has a built-in safeguard mode that simulates a world with more than one. Hence, you don’t have to feel lonely. The simulation naturally ends the moment you stop believing it’s possible to be and have more than that which is One.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
Knowing there’s no more than that which is One, you are never afraid because it takes more than one to feel something.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
Some say that Alexius’ Duality Hacks succeed because powerful forces oppose undoing the belief in more than one. Yet experiencing more than one is like seeing others in a dream: nobody is in there, so only the dreamer must undo the belief in more than one. Therefore, since undoing that belief takes no more than one and since there is no more than One, nobody can oppose it, except in fantasy.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
Ancient scriptures suggest the world is an illusion. If so, this also applies to Alexius’ Duality Hacks. However, a significant distinction separates them from most spiritual teachings. The latter offers you something to help you fulfil your desire for more. Conversely, Alexius’ Duality Hacks undo the illusion of more by not offering you anything but the bliss of nothing. [Photo: Alexius]
»Non-duality means ‘not two’ or ‘non-separation’. It’s the sense that all things are interconnected and not separate, while at the same time, all things retain their individuality. An awareness of non-duality gives you a bigger perspective on life, a greater sense of freedom, and brings you a more stable happiness«. Quote from the blog ‘Non-duality Talk’.
The above quote begins by stating that non-duality is not two but non-separation. It then splits non-duality into more than one, so you can gain more perspective, freedom, and stability. But as non-duality is formless and therefore endless, anything that requires more than one denies it.
So how do we find non-duality? The question itself is a paradox, rooted in duality, and hopes that duality can be reconciled with non-duality, as the quote attempts. However, the two are fundamentally exclusive. Still, within the context of a world of duality, we can show that duality is unreal, since everything in duality consists of more than one. From this follows that if you want non-duality, you must leave duality.
However, from the perspective of non-duality, leaving duality stands as a metaphor, since duality does not exist. Therefore, there’s nothing to depart from except the belief in more than one. Yet even this is a metaphor, because any attempt to explain is a product of duality rather than non-duality.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
Each metaphor in Alexius’ Duality Hacks adds to the next to expose all ways as fake, because it takes more than one to understand something, and there’s no more than that which is One.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
A tale about more than One
You can compare the formlessness of Oneness to one endless thought without boundaries or breaks. Nothing disturbs its peace until it splits in two: one part resembling a Person and the other resembling a World that appears external.
To sustain the illusion of more than one, the division continues. The thought called the World splits into Good and Bad, and the thought called a Person splits into a Judge and an Executioner. Hence, the Person seems to have Good and Bad experiences.
The Executioner punishes those whom the Judge deems responsible for the Person’s Bad experiences in the World. This makes the Person feel off the hook. Someone else is judged guilty for the Bad things the Person feels inside. But since the Bad things within keep surfacing, the Person constantly demands that the Judge and Executioner find new scapegoats, thus reinforcing division.
However, Oneness, being formless, cannot be divided except in fantasy. Therefore, the fantasy of division plays out internally in the Person, who projects everything perceived as bad in itself onto imagined external groups or individuals, such as immigrants, capitalists, or communists. The internal role of the Judge – the part that makes the judgments – may be projected onto authority figures like a god, a parent, a boss, or a lover. And the Executioner – the force that punishes – may be associated with society at large. In this way, blaming outside entities reveals how a Person experiences perceived divisions within oneself.
The Person must bring back all the projections to oneself to undo the belief in separation. Yet the Executioner can be challenging to acknowledge as part of oneself. It’s violent and inflexible, and the Person prefers to see oneself as tolerant, although not of the Executioner within.
But the Person must accept the Executioner in itself to undo separation. If the Person omits the Executioner, it will keep fearing authority figures, and separation will persist instead of fading away.
Leave a Reply