When you believe there is more than one, everything requires more than one

Updated June 4, 2022

It takes two to define a person in the world.

It takes two to be different, but it also takes two to see that differences do not make a difference. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

It takes two to become enlightened. »When your eyes become single, your whole body shall be full of light«, Jesus said. And it takes two to appear as someone in a world where there seems to be more than one.

It takes two to make a difference. Both the positive and the negative pole is needed to produce electricity.

It takes two to see that the apparent differences do not make a difference.

Everything in a world where there seems to be more than one requires the involvement of at least two. You cannot appear to be someone without being defined by something else, and there cannot be a world without someone to define it.

In reality, there is no more than that which is one, but as the world where you appear to be is based on the idea that it is possible to be and have more than One, to come back to reality, you have to start as if you are more than one.

The person you appear to be in the world cannot be in the virtual world of a game like Super Mario, so you pretend to be there to participate in it. That, however, does not make the virtual world – or your appearance there – real. On the contrary, you are not what and where you pretend to be.

In the same manner, a world where there seems to be more than one cannot make that which is you real because being there is something you pretend. And no matter how good you are at it and whatever you pretend to be, it is not real, including appearing to be spiritual.

No words that seem to value you as someone more evolved and better than others will make you anything other than what you already are in the world where there seems to be more than one, namely an illusion.

If you pretend to be a black car in the world of Monopoly, what you pretend to be is an illusion regardless you go to prison, own many houses and whatnot. There can be many changes in a game, but it does not change that you are not there. You only appear to be there.

To not focus on anything in particular.

When not focusing on anything in particular, the world of the outward-facing senses fades away. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

To bid welcome the Enlightenment of that which is one, you must overlook the apparent differences in a world where there seems to be more than one. Not by perceiving them as one. On the contrary. Separation is the nature of the world.

So if you see them one by one without focusing on anyone in particular, their apparent differences make no difference. Therefore, since they become the same, so do your eyes. Thus as one eye, they fill your whole body with light.

The Enlightenment of that which is one is not possible with two eyes. They must be closed so that the dimensional world experienced with the outward-facing senses is not seen. Well, it is not so much the eyes that must be closed, but your attention towards the world you believe they see.

In the Enlightenment of that which is one, there is literally nothing to see. If there is, you have not been blinded by the brightness of the Enlightenment of that which is one but fenced it off, so all you get are glimpses of it, which often is confused with the Enlightenment of that which is one.

So many search for their real self. But since it requires more than one to find something, and there is no more than that which is one, what you discover is unreal.

Nobody knows what the Enlightenment of that which is One is, nor Alexius. It cannot be experienced because that requires more than one. Nevertheless, most of those who talk about it show off as if they know what it is. They are just as eager as everybody else in the world to be acknowledged as someone definitive. In their case, they achieve it by explaining what Enlightenment is. Therefore, since the belief in being someone definitive is the cause of suffering, their teachings of light bring about darkness.

It is very beautiful with the light of the sun coming through the clouds, but it has nothing to do with enlightenment. It is just another sight in the world, that is just as virtual as the so-called egoless states the gurus and their followers are dreaming about.

It is stunning with the light of the sun coming through the clouds, but it has nothing to do with Enlightenment. It is just another sight produced via the outward-facing senses to make you so excited that it seems real although it is make-believe. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

The idea that Enlightenment results in a person who is peaceful, loving, compassionate, patient, humble, open-minded and at one with everything is an idle hope of becoming a superior being, thus more than that which is One.

But the Enlightenment of that which is one does not bring about anything. Results are of a world where there seems to be more than one, and the Enlightenment of that which is one does not know more than one. Therefore, one who is to be compared to the Enlightenment of that which is One has not been changed or transformed. Everything is the same, except a world where there seems to be more than one is not perceived as real.

If you need time to process this article, you consent to the belief that it is possible to be and have more than that which is one because processing something, as well as taking your time, requires more than one.

APPENDIX:
The visual aspect of Enlightenment of that which is one can be compared to closing all apps on a computer, including the one simulating the desktop. Without the appearance of a desktop, there is nothing to hide the light used to simulate a world on the screen.

The aspect of Enlightenment of that which is one that Aum, Sohang or The Word of God symbolise, can be compared to the humming from the fan or the engine in a computer. You can hear this vibration all the time – especially if you do not look at the screen or listen to the sounds of the world simulated by the computer.

Though the light behind the desktop and the distant humming are the means for fabricating a simulated reality on the computer screen, they are not part of this fake world, so if you want to see or hear what is powering the world that appears on the screen, you must do what is needed to stop that world. However, as long as you see or hear something, it is not the Enlightenment of that which is One but glimpses of it. See hack #6.2 Glimpses of the Enlightenment of that which is One.

This is a metaphor to say that you have to undo the belief in a world where there seems to be more than one in order not to hide the formlessness of oneness that was already there and forever will be.


NOTES:

  • As a person in the world, Alexius is not religious or has a need to follow so-called spiritual persons or philosophies. Nobody needs to do that. However, it is as illusionary to follow somebody as not, so feel free to do whatever seems beneficial in undoing the belief that there is more than that which is One.
  • This article is part of hack #6.1 The Enlightenment of that which is One.

‘The Enlightenment of that which is one’ cannot be seen

Updated August 1, 2022

The eye cannot see this pic. It is registered as light divided into red, green and blue by three taps in the eye. This info is sent to the brain, where the same organ process both so-called reality and imagined or virtual reality The three colors are mixed in such a way, that it appears to be an image of someting solid in the world, that can be defined by time and space, even though almost 99% of matter consists of empty space.

Since it requires more than one to understand something, you call off the Enlightenment of that which is One if you try to process it. And since it also takes more than one to get a second chance, this is out of the question. But, since oneness is formless, thus endless, you have never left it. Thus it is only the belief in separation that needs to be undone. Fortunately, the Enlightenment of that which is One does that right away. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

The Enlightenment of that which is One cannot be known because it takes more than one to be aware of something. However, having been in a spiral of colours exploding into a bright white light, opaque and formless, one may vaguely remember that it abruptly extracted the experience of being someone definitive and left it at the threshold of a black hole.* After that, nothing gracefully fell through a neverending void into that which is one.

From the above, you may get the impression that the Enlightenment of that which is One is a process over time. But that is not so – it happens simultaneously, or rather, it does not occur because it requires more than one for something to happen. That is why, when returning to a world where there seems to be more than one, it may take a long time to grasp you are to be compared to the Enlightenment of that which is One.

But the reason could also be that the Enlightenment of that which is One has nothing to do with the merry-go-round stories made up by doo-gooders – based on speculations and second-hand knowledge about awakening, connection, synchronicity, inner peace, stillness, heaven and whatnot.

You do not experience anything because you are abruptly destroyed. Nothing is left of what you believed to be in a world where there seems to be more than one. You never were in such a world, nor anywhere else because it takes more than one to be somewhere, and there is no more than that which is One since it is formless, thus endless.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Alexius’ Duality Hacks offers no hope because it operates in time, which is an illusion.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

There is no way to the Enlightenment of that which is One, especially not of restraint or following a schedule. Going there is a way of uncertainty, one beat at a time.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The Enlightenment of that which is One is not a way back to oneness because you have never left it. This is why nothing is going back through a black hole into the formlessness of oneness. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

To get a sense of the Enlightenment of that which is One, you must empty yourself for all ideas about it. And then again, doing so will not help because it enhances the belief that you are someone definitive. And believing that is what hides the Enlightenment of that which is One. Therefore, do not try to implement this article in your way of seeing things, but use it to have your belief system undone.

The Enlightenment of that which is One can be compared to being a door to oneness. But just like a door in a house has nothing to do with the house, the Enlightenment of that which is One is not oneness. It has no doors because it requires more than one to have a door or anything at all. Nor is it in a world where there seems to be more than one, as there is no more than that which is One.

No worries. That which is you is not in a world where there seems to be more than one. Just like – in the context of such a world – you are not in the world of a computer game, even though it may feel so because of the reactions to the game. These reactions, however, are not caused by the world in the game – it has no such power – but how you choose to perceive it. In other words, the experience of being someone in a virtual world is an experience fabricated by yourself.

Likewise, the experience of being someone in a world where there seems to be more than one. And then again, this is not really so. That which is you is not imagining being in a world where there seems to be more than one because it takes more than one to be somewhere, and that which is you is not anywhere because it is the formlessness of oneness.

Nevertheless, you experience being someone in a world where there seems to be more than one for some unexplainable reason. So, in the context of this experience, the Enlightenment of that which is One is the door out of it because it undoes all experiences.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Seen from the world of duality enlightenment, which represents the formlessness of non-duality, is very boring compared to all the excitement duality seems to offer.

The formlessness of oneness is very dull compared to the excitement of a world where there seems to be more than one – at least as seen from the perspective of such a world. Yet, none of the experiences in such a world last, so believing to be someone there, you can never get enough. But that is not a problem in oneness because there is no more than One. Thus you have everlasting peace. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

Meditation may result in the experience of something you interpret as infinity, purity, divinity or unity. But you will not experience the Enlightenment of that which is One by meditating or doing something else. It cannot be brought about because that takes more than one.

Even if you could cause the Enlightenment of that which is One, you would probably hold back. Perceived from a world where there seems to be more than, oneness is incredibly dull. There is nothing to see or feel or look forward to. Thus it is not very appealing compared to the excitement you get in a world where there seems to be more than one from falling in love, having sex or whatnot. However, it has a prize, which is a constant feeling of failure because no matter how much more you seem to become or have, you are bound to lose it.

But suppose the Enlightenment of that which is One is what you long for. In that case, it is best to be so disinterested in achieving something that you pay no attention to having the belief in being someone undone by a highly bright light, so nobody gently falls into the formlessness of oneness.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The purpose of feelings is to make you feel more than that which is one, although it is formless, thus endless, wherefore there is no more than one.

In other words, feeling something is an illusion. The same applies to experiencing something. That is why the Enlightenment of that which is One neither can be felt nor experienced.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The Enlightenment of that which is One does not change anything – except that you know everything experienced is fake, including god, love, ego, and whatnot. When you know that, you are free to step on it and play the game of being someone in a world where there seems to be more than one.

One way to play the game is to pretend to be in it because where you pretend to be, you are not. Read about this in hack #1.3 Pretending to be someone definitive is liberation.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

When the sun shines on a window, it reveals many things one may not have seen before. But, on the other hand, the Enlightenment of that which is One shows nothing. It does not shed its light on anything, as that requires more than one. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

When the sun is shining sharp and bright, it reveals the state of a window. However, this is contrary to the Enlightenment of that which is One. Although it can be said to be brighter than thousands of suns, it reveals nothing. There is not something to see and no need to see anything. Not because the light fulfils you, but because it undoes the belief in being someone definable.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Alexius’ Enlightened Non-Teachings presents no definition of the Enlightenment of that which is One because it is not part of a world defined by time and space, thus not definable.

That is why it cannot be seen. Yet if you return from it to a world defined by time and space, you may have vague memories of a light brighter than thousands of suns if you are a visually minded person. If you are an audio minded person, you may have vague memories of ethereal harmonies with sounds that can be compared to bells and harps. See the article What sort of external music resembles the internal one.

And suppose you are an emotional-minded person. In that case, you probably have vague memories of a feeling that can be compared to the sensation of thousands of bubbly Coca-Colas mixed into one bubble. This is actually what the vibration that Aum, Sohang or The Word of God symbolise. Should you be into the taste of things, you may return with vague memories of thousands of smoothies fused into one flavour of milk and honey, maybe with a hint of strawberries or liquorice.

Since the world generally focuses on seeable effects, the visual aspect of the Enlightenment of that which is One is the most known. But the other features also make you forget to focus on something definable, so you, as nobody, are drawn into the formlessness of oneness.

Whatever aspect of the Enlightenment you naturally are attracted depends on your preferences as someone definitive. The goal, though, is not to see, hear, feel or taste the Enlightenment of that which is One. It cannot be experienced since there is no more than that which is One, and it takes more than one to experience something. For the same reason, there is no goal.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The graphic is grabbed from the web.

The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Believing the world – including astral planes and whatnot – is real can be compared to sitting in a cinema, where you project yourself onto the world that appears to be on the screen so that the reactions to your projections seem to come from the world instead of you. Hence you believe in experiencing a world outside of you.

The Enlightenment of that which is One is to be compared to a sudden crack in the roll of the film with the movie you project yourself onto. Therefore, the experience of this world is replaced by a bright white light, thus not something to project yourself upon.

In the context of this metaphor, what is real is not the bright white light but the source that is projecting it, namely the movie projector, which is neither in the world on the screen nor the bright white light, although it is the power making it possible for something to appear on the screen.

But since this metaphor is part of the movie called The World, it is, of course, as fictitious as everything else in The World. And since there is nothing unreal, there is no movie, thus nobody watching it. Hence the movie metaphor is just a way to explain what cannot be described. If it could, the film would be real, and there would be somebody in it.

This is why so many want to know how the world was created and why they are there. If it can be explained, they can rest assured they are real. However, in reality, there is nothing to explain because there is no more than that which is One, and it takes more than one to explain something.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The Enlightenment of that which is One cannot reveal itself if you want it to change or expand your consciousness because it takes more than one to be aware of anything. But since glimpses of the Enlightenment of that which is One are samples, thus incomplete, you can have that. Read more about that in hack #6.2 Glimpses of the Enlightenment of that which is One.


*) It may not be part of the Enlightened memories that the data of being someone is left at the threshold of a black hole. Perhaps it is a conclusion made in retrospect.


NOTE: This article is part of hack #6.1 The Enlightenment of that which is One.

I am the Destroyer of Worlds!

Updated June 30, 2022

Painting with reflections of light on my iPhone

Alexius’ Duality Hacks talks about two kinds of Enlightenment: the Enlightenment of that which is One, which cannot be experienced as that requires more than one, and glimpses of it experienced via the inward-facing senses when the outward ones are partly closed. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

After a long, intense night of driving a taxi many years ago, Alexius forgot what and where he was, so there was nothing to hide the Enlightenment of that which is One.

When he later read part of The New Testament and Bhagavad Gita, some passages triggered memories of the Enlightenment of that which is One. The memories were vague, though, because Alexius did not experience the Enlightenment since it takes more than one. Nevertheless, the faint memories of something indefinable are enough to know that everything definable is an illusion. That is why he is to be compared to the Enlightenment of that which is One.

The Enlightenment of that which is One is literally light, like when Jesus said: When your eyes become single, your whole body will be full of light – or like St. Paul when he was blinded by light – or like Arjuna according to Bhagavad Gita said after having been initiated by Krishna: »It is brighter than thousands of suns. I have become the destroyer of worlds …«

A dream can be compared to a simulated world meanwhile layered on top that which is real. As long as you believe the simulated world is real, it seems to cover that which is real.

However, Alexius would not put it like that. There is nobody in the Enlightenment of that which is One, so there is not a body to be full of light nor a world to destroy. The world is not there, and there is no memory of it ever having been. It is like a dream that is gone when you wake up in the morning.

The translations of both The New Testament and Bhagavad Gita differ from translator to translator, and as the above quotes are from memory, they may not be the exact words in your addition. But it does not matter because regardless of how you speak about it, the Enlightenment of that which is One cannot be described. In other words, what is said about it in Alexius’ Duality Hacks should not be taken as the real thing, nor as pointers towards it, as that requires more than one.

Imagine you want to describe an orange to somebody who has never seen or tasted an orange. For example, you say its colour is like an orange sunset, it is round like a ball and tastes like sweetened water. Yet the person you have given this description will never find out what an orange is by drinking sweet water from a rounded cup at sunset.

You have to see and taste it yourself to know what it is. However, in the context of the Enlightenment of that which is One, you will never know what it is because a person cannot be Enlightened. You as a person are erased in the Enlightenment of that which is One. Thus there is nobody to experience it.

In the Enlightenment of that which is One, the world is not anymore. Not because it has been destroyed, but because it has never been – except as a fantasy. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

If you return to a world where there seems to be more than one after the Enlightenment of that which is One, there is no more need to search for the meaning of life. You know there is no more than that which is One, so there is no life in a world where it seems to be more than one. Besides, searching for something requires more than one, so whatever you think you realise is unreal.

One who is to be compared to the Enlightenment of that which is One has no need to be forgiven or loved because there is no ‘I’ deciding what to do, thus, nobody to forgive or love. But when there is no ‘I’ to protect and preserve, there is the freedom to pretend to be someone. Therefore, in the context of a game like Monopoly, you may appear to be a red car one day and a blue one another day.

In short, there is no need to keep together an appearance of someone with coherent opinions and behaviour. The ‘I’ is a tool used like the legs, hands and eyes, for example.

Alexius, for example, has pretended to be a child, teenager, taxi driver, monk, husband, daddy, adult, businessman, millionaire, designer, teacher, photographer and recently non-teacher. See more of his appearances in Alexius, The Man.

Regarding the Enlightenment of that which is One, it is best to forget everything you have ever heard or read about it – including what is said in Alexius’ Enlightened Non-Teachings. Any idea of how it looks is wrong. It has no shape. It is formless. Yet, if you look for something intangible, you still look for something. But if you do not believe to be someone definitive – or do not care about it – there does not seem to be something hiding that which cannot be seen, heard, felt or tasted.


NOTE: This article is part of hack #6.1 From the inward senses through a black hole into that which is One.

The fear of Enlightenment

Updated June 5, 2022

If you fear the destructive powers of the world, you will probably fear the enlightenment of that which is one, as its light will destroy every definable feature of you just like that. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

If you fear the destructive powers of the world, you may also fear the Enlightenment of that which is One, as it relentlessly destroys every definable feature of what you believe to be in a world where there seems to be more than one. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

VERSION 1:
Jesus said that going to heaven – assuming this meant going into the Enlightenment of that which is One – is more complicated than for a camel to go through an eye of a needle. Yet it seems a person momentarily can forget to uphold the belief in being someone definitive so that there is not something definable to go through the eye of a needle into the Enlightenment of that which is One.

However, since going somewhere requires someone specific, a bit of the belief in being definitive gets through the needle. And this little piece fears being annihilated by the Enlightenment of that which is One, which seems to be more powerful than thousands of atomic bombs.

To defend itself, the leftover identity of you looks for something to define. So, for example, even though the speed of Enlightenment is so fast that there is no separation, it imagines seeing different shapes of light, so it can get back to a world where there seems to be more than one. In such a world, everything happens so slowly that there is plenty of time to realise there is nothing to fear if you do not believe to be someone definitive because then there is nobody to annihilate.

Maybe that was why Alexius returned from the Enlightenment of that which is One. He wanted to escape what was perceived as a relentless power taking his freedom away and wiping out his identity, which is what happens seen from the point of believing to be someone definitive. So he is probably both a non-teacher and non-student of Alexius’ Enlightened Non-Teachings to unlearn this belief, thus preventing the fear reflexes from fighting the Enlightenment of that which is One.

That said, of course, there is nothing to undo and nobody to return to the formlessness of oneness. It has never been left since that calls for more than one.

You cannot bring something into that which is one. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

VERSION 2:
When the cats living with Alexius are at sleep, they sometimes move as if they have a nightmare – at least, this is what he concludes. The oneness of life may draw the same conclusion if it could sense the stress coming from those imagining to be somebody in a world where there seems to be more than one. But just like Alexius cannot see the dreams of his cats, neither can oneness see the imaginations of those who believe that life can be divided into more than one.

Even if life could sense this fantasy in which you are someone who needs to take something from someone else to survive, it would not stop the imagination because it could be too scary to suddenly see that what and where you believe in being is an illusion. Thus life tries to comfort you in your dream world while it sweetly whispers: Come home.

This whisper is heard or felt as an unpronounceable humming often symbolised by the word Aum or Sohang. Read more about that in Life has no secrets. If the humming makes you open your eyes for just one second, you will not see the world you are dreaming about but a light that is much more potent than anything in the dream. The force of an atomic bomb is nothing compared to the strength of this light. It does not illuminate something and is neither opaque nor transparent but so intense that it cannot be apprehended.

To bid welcome the enlightenment of that which is one all thoughts made to fabricate an image of you as something definable must be left at the edge of a black hole, so that there is nothing for the bright white light to suck through a black hole into that which is one. This will of course seems very frightening if you want to remain someone definable in a world, where there seems to be more than one, and if so chances are that you out of desperation will define the bright white light and/or the black hole as something, and so you are back in a definable world. If you leave all thoughts behind at the edge of the black hole and end up being no different from that which is one, you can pick up all the thoughts again – in linear time – within a few minutes and return as someone in a world, where there seems to be more than one.

The Enlightenment of that which is One sucks out all the thoughts stored in the brain, making up the experience of being someone definitive. They are left at the edge of a black hole, so there is nothing to fall/float through it into the formlessness of that which is One. This seems very frightening if you want to uphold the belief in being someone definitive. No worries, you take back the thought construction left at the edge of the black hole, which is done by comparing the black hole to something. In this way, the Enlightenment of that which is One becomes definable, and as that is only possible in a definable world, it is over, and you appear as someone in a world defined by time and space. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Without further notice, the light relentlessly and most powerfully wipe out every definable feature that makes up your identity in the dream of a world where life seems to be divided into more than one. This is done so fast and efficient that there is nobody to know you once was somebody, thus nobody to fear obliteration and the free-fall through a black hole into the formlessness of oneness.

But suppose you are attached to being someone definitive. In that case, you fear becoming formless. Thus you fight it by, first, objectifying the fear as something caused by a ruthless force that is determined to destroy you. Second, you perceive the fear you embodied to be powerful enough to smash the Enlightenment of that which is One into more than one, wherefore you, as someone definitive, are back in a world where there seems to be more than one.

That said, you do not have the power to smash the Enlightenment of that which is One, and it does it have the ability to destroy you. It does not have the power to do anything since that requires more than one. And you do not have any power because you do not exist. This is why nothing is terminated in the Enlightenment of that which is One. Instead, you forget to uphold the belief in being someone definitive.

In other words, there is nothing to fear in oneness because it takes more than one to worry about something. However, imagining being someone in a world where there seems to be more than one, it always seems as if there is something to fear. Because to appear as someone definitive, you must permanently exclude what is judged not to be you. And since you do that by projecting your shit onto others, you fear their retaliation.

Fortunately, when not caring about your image, there is nothing to lose from being nobody in a free-fall through a black hole into the formlessness of oneness.

Since there is no more than that which is One, and it requires more than one to wake up, it is impossible. The same applies to reading this article and Alexius having written it. That which we are is not in a world where there seems to be more than one. One could say we are dreaming about it. However, this is a metaphor because, in reality, it takes more than one to dream about something.

How come it seems,that I am wearing a sun-hat?It could be that,it is the season for hats.

Nothing can stop you on Highway One except the belief in a world where there seems to be more than one. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

APPENDIX:
Since the Enlightenment of that which is One is one perpetual present, it cannot be brought back into a world of linear time, so Alexius only has vague memories of something unseparated. It may seem unclear if you have to be nobody to welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One or that it is something it takes care of.

Unfortunately, Alexius cannot clarify that. There is no transition from a world where there seems to be more than one to the Enlightenment of that which is One, so he does not know when it sets in. There are vague memories, though, about total chaos inside him just before it sets in. But no chaos, peace or anything else in the Enlightenment of that which is One, as that requires more than one. For the same reason, nothing is taken away but the illusion of more than one.


NOTE: This article is part of hack #6.1 The Enlightenment of that which is One.

’The Enlightenment of that which is one’

Updated June 1, 2022

Why do the flowers fall off the trees on the street sometimes outside Alexius’ home? The answer is simple. It is the season for that. Likewise, it seems to be the season for Alexius to write about bidding welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

The Enlightenment of that which is One does not result in spiritual understanding or connection with a higher being. On the contrary, it results in nothing because it takes more than one to cause something.

Since it also takes more than one to return to that which is One, you cannot do that. But since the same applies to departing oneness, you have never left it. That is why it does not know that you believe to be someone in a world where there seems to be more than one.

Most books or lectures about the Enlightenment of that which is Oneare based on speculations of how to exclude what is judged as dark evil become full of light. But to exclude is to separate, thus an enhancement of the belief in being someone definitive – and nothing definable can enter the Enlightenment of that which is One.

The enlightenment of that which is one can be compared to taking a ride in a fairground carousel so fast, that the mind has to give up seeing any differences at all. Consequently it is not possible to remain as someone definitive and so there is therefore nobody to experience the enlightenment of that which is one. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

The Enlightenment of that which is One can be compared to taking a ride in a fairground carousel moving so fast that the brain gives up separating it into different appearances. Consequently, since there is no separation to establish you as someone definitive, there is nobody to experience being brought back to what you never left, namely the formlessness of oneness. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

The Enlightenment of that which is One undoes this belief. Metaphorically speaking, it takes you on a ride in a fairground carousel moving so fast that the brain gives up producing different images of it. Thus, eventually, everything is fused into one bright light. However, it is not a light that lightens up anything because that requires more than one. For the same reason, there is no memory of a world where there seems to be more than one.

In other words, the experience of being someone definitive is wiped out by the Enlightenment of that which is One, so there is nobody left to experience bliss or anything else. Therefore, when Alexius talks about the Enlightenment of that which is One, it is not based on the experience of it but on vague memories of something that cannot be experienced.

Reading his memories, you may get the impression that the Enlightenment of that which is One is a sequence of events happening in linear time. But everything ‘happens ‘simultaneously. However, that cannot be described in a world of linear time. And even though it is described as it ‘happened’ many years ago, in non-linear time, it is still ‘happening.’ Hence his description might be a mix of several ‘excursions’ from linear time into one perpetual present.

An early morning, when he was 22 years old, Alexius bid welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One after intensely having worked as a taxi driver for about 15 hours. Somehow the sum of the images from driving back and forth the streets continually looking for customers turned into something less definable and more blurry. When he came home Alexius had no energy left to establish a focused image of himself in a world defined by time and space. Thus forgetting what and where he was, he was not aware of a transition to the spiralling show of psychedelic light that did not seem to come from anywhere and to suck him into nowhere.

All info of someone definitive is extracted by either the light, sound, feeling or taste of the enlightenment of that which is one, so that there is nobody to be sucked through a black hole into the formlessness of that which is one, where there is neither chaos or order, as that would require more than one. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

All info of someone definitive is extracted by either the light, sound, feeling or taste of the enlightenment of that which is One. Thereafter the light sucks nobody  through a black gap in itself into the formlessness of onenes. Most, though, try to avoid loosing their identity by establishing the black gap as something know like a black hole. Thus they remain someone definitive and cannot be sucked through the gap in the light. But they can have glimpses of light on the way back to a world where there seems to be more than one, which many mistakes for being Enlightened. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

The enlightenment of that which is One is to be compared to the fusion of all lights, or sounds, or emotions, or tastes – depending on our preference as someone definitive in a world where there seems to be more than one.

None of these fusions are the formlessness of that which is One. They are merely ways to attract you so you do not resist, when all the thoughts collected to fabricate your personality are extracted by the enlightenment of that which is One, so nothing definable is sucked through a black hole into the formlessness of oneness.

This article is about the first time the belief in being someone definitive momentarily was undone for Alexius. The enlightenment of that which is One was bid welcome in its most known aspect, namely light. Much later the other aspects – sound, emotion and taste – was also bid welcome. Not as a mix though but one by one. It is not possible to mix something in the enlightenment of that which is One, as that requires more than one.

Alexius assumes it is not necessary to bid welcome all the aspects, but that one of them is sufficient in regard to completely forget the imagination of a world where there seems to be more than one.

Suddenly a black gap with no fixed location nor a fixed form, looking like a horse head or an embryo, showed up in the psychedelic light show. And then an utterly colourless light – brighter than the coloured light outside the black spot – started to form as a ring with no defined boundary inside the black area’s edges, which apparently was a hole because colourless light exploded out of it.

This light absorbed everything. It was everywhere and yet nowhere. Without any mention, it knocked out the concept of Alexius and a world where there seems to be more than one, so the nothingness of him gracefully fell into the formlessness of oneness – or maybe it floated into oneness. Alexius cannot recall because the thought construction shaping him was left outside the black hole. Besides, everything happened simultaneously. Nevertheless, there is a sense of forever falling while swimming in a space that was not there – and then, in the exact moment as forever falling, it never happened because there was nothing but that which is one, and it takes more than one for something to happen.

That is all, folks. There is no more to tell. At this point, the Enlightenment of that which is One is over, and there is nothing but the formlessness of oneness. It is not a big void of nothing filled with exotic ideas of unconditional love and whatnot. On the contrary, it is not filled with anything since that requires more than one.

Thus oneness is neither peaceful nor stillness or anything else. Metaphorically speaking, its speed is so fast that it is not possible to differentiate anything. Hence there is not something to see or anyone to realise that. Nor to hear the incredible noise of the speed. Especially because it is so loud that all sounds merge into one, all lights into one light, all emotions into one feeling, and tastes into one taste.

The above is not to be understood as the Enlightenment of that which is One is a mix of light, sound, emotion and taste. They are four aspects of it. But you only bid one of them welcome at a time. It does not matter which one of them. They all have the same purpose. Namely to attract to the extent that you cannot help but let them extract all thoughts, making it appear as if you are someone definitive. And then leave them at the edge of a black hole so that there is nothing definable to be sucked through it into the formlessness of oneness.

The latter about leaving thoughts at the edge of a black hole may be a twisted memory. And it is, of course, a metaphor to say oneness is on the other side of a black hole because it is formless, thus without inside or outside.

Dunno if there is a spiral around the black hole of the enlightenment of that which is one, because being that close nothing seems to differ from each other. Yet for a moment so short, that it is not conceivable, a light inside the edge of the black hole so much brighter that the very bright light around it, suddenly explodes into a formless light that does not include Alexius but the formlessness of that which I am. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Alexius seems to remember a spiral around a black hole in the Enlightenment of that which is One. However, he does not remember it exactly as in this image – either because everything was moving extremely fast or he was so close that nothing seemed to differ from each other. Yet for a moment, so short that it is not conceivable, white light inside the edge of the black hole – so much brighter than the very colourful light around it – exploded into a bright light that erased everything definable. Thus he cannot report what ‘happened’ after being sucked by formless light through a shapeless black hole into that which is One. Nor can he find an image on the web that can illustrate the vague memories of this. Fortunately, you can go there yourself – or rather stop going anywhere. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

THE ENLIGHTENMENT OF THAT WHICH IS ONE IS INEXPLAINABLE
When Alexius welcomed the Enlightenment of that which is One, he was not aware of doing that. Actually, he had never heard about it, nor seen a black hole. Fortunately, he did not define anything because otherwise, he would have bounced back to a world where there seems to be more than one. Thus the description of a black hole leading into that which is One is made retrospectively.

Actually, it was not before much later, when he saw pictures of black holes in the universe, that he sensed how familiar they were. But calling a black hole a path into oneness is a metaphor because there is neither an entrance nor an exit to that which is one. In other words, describing the Enlightenment of that which is One is impossible because even though so much goes on, nothing definable happens because it is one perpetual present.

To bid welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One, you do not have to drive a taxi all night or be in ’a deep sleep’ like Buddha supposedly talked about. Whatever way you lose focus or stop defining and labelling will do regarding bidding welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One. However, meditation may not work. It is generally about concentrating and focusing on achieving something specific – and anything definable fend off the Enlightenment of that which is One.


*) Links to articles about the Enlightenment of that which is One versus glimpses of it


NOTES: 

  • The article is about the most known aspect of the Enlightenment of that which is One, namely light. The element that comes to you when bidding welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One depends on your preferences as someone definitive. If you are very visual, light comes to extract all your definable traits, so there is not something to be sucked through a black hole into that which is One. Read here about the other aspects.
  • This article is part of hack #6.1 The Enlightenment of that which is One.

 

 

 

Alexius’ Enlightened Non-Teachings are coloured by the personality of Alexius – or rather how you perceive it. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

Why do the oranges fall from the trees on the street outside Alexius’ home every November? The answer is simple. It is the season for that. Likewise, it seems to be the season to write about bidding welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One.

THE ENLIGHTENMENT OF THAT WHICH IS ONE IS NOT IN A WORLD WHERE THERE SEEMS TO BE MORE THAN ONE

 

singingbirdA bird does not sing because it has an answer.
It sings because it has a song.

Chinese Proverb

When you forget what and where you appear to be, ‘the Enlightenment of that which One’ sets in

Updated September 8, 2022

_IGP9809-Edit-5

Praying, meditating, fasting, dressing in exotic clothes or being with special people in unique places does not help you welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One because doing something implies that you are somebody. But if you forget what and where you are, there is nobody to fend off the Enlightenment of that which is One wait for. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

Since it takes more than one to be aware of something, the Enlightenment of that which is One cannot be experienced. Thus nobody can tell you what it is or teach you how to bid it welcome. But over time, you can learn not to welcome a world where there seems to be more than one, so it does not appear to hide that which is One. This is the function of all Alexius’ Duality Hacks except the Enlightenment of that which is One (hack #6.1). It terminates everything that is not one without delay.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Alexius’ Enlightened Non-Teachings do not use the word Enlightened to describe someone who has achieved a better understanding or a higher consciousness. You do not get wiser or loftier from the Enlightenment mentioned in Alexius’ Duality Hacks. It is the Enlightenment of that which is One, and it requires more than one to become something.

The awareness of ever having experienced being someone in a world where there seems to be more than one is terminated in the Enlightenment of that which is One. Actually, all consciousness comes to an end because it takes more than one to know something. This takes a split second or maybe more. It cannot be known because there is no time when nobody is aware of it. Hence there is no experience of past and future to hide, there never was or will be anything but one perpetual present.

Most, however, return to the awareness of being someone in a world where there seems to be more than one before their consciousness is completely cut off. They avoid that by justifying the fear of destruction with that which is One, and so they are back in a world where there seems to be more than one.

If you do not want to fend off the Enlightenment of that which is One, do not by projecting your fear onto it but include the horror as it is. However, not by embracing it, since that establishes you as someone definitive, but by completely being frightened and nothing else. Hence there is not something to define you as someone, and thus nobody to prevent the Enlightenment of that which is One from leaving what you believed in being at the edge of a black hole, consuming the light and the emptiness of you, so nothing gracefully falls into that which is One.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The return to that which is One does not involve transformation but the destruction of you, so if you are into realising your self, awaken, live in the now, come from the heart, and whatnot, the Enlightenment of that which is One is not for you. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

If you are visually minded, you seem to return to that which is One as bright light. But if you are more into listening, feeling or tasting, you seem to return as sound, touch or taste. That said, you do not actually return to that which is One because you never left it. It is impossible since doing so requires more than one. However, it seems possible to believe there is more than that which is One, and in that context, you seem to return to that which is One.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

None of the exciting stories about divine presence, higher self and consciousness applies to that which is One but a world where there seems to be more than one. But what you get there is not real.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Hardly anybody welcomes the Enlightenment of that which is One. However, they may accept glimpses because, contrary to the Enlightenment of that which is One, they can be experienced without having one’s consciousness erased. And you can fool yourself into thinking they have awakened or transformed you.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

There is not something to awaken from or return to, nor any awareness to achieve because there is no more than that which is one – and it takes more than one to do something.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

As already said, the Enlightenment of that which is One cannot be experienced by somebody. Hence the description in Alexius’ Enlightened Non-Teachings comes from somebody having memories of being nobody falling through a black hole into that which is one. In other words, although the Enlightenment of that which is One is impersonal, Alexius’ description of it is personal. Thus he cannot promise his description of the Enlightenment of that which is One is correct.

But he can guarantee that the descriptions cannot be replicated by you or himself. First of all, because it takes more than one to reproduce something, and secondly, because there is nothing personal in the Enlightenment of that which is One. See also The ins and outs of a black hole.

Yet, his descriptions of the Enlightenment of that which is One may inspire you to have the belief in being someone definitive undone. Part of that is to forget everything you have heard or read about Enlightenment – including what you believe to read here.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

To avoid being affected by thoughts, no particular posture or surroundings are needed. All that is required is not to be concerned about the outcome of anything. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

A particular body posture, state of mind, kundalini awakening and whatnot is not needed to welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One because it does not enter the body, aura, chakras or anything else in a world where there seems to be more than one. On the contrary, it undoes the belief in anything that can be experienced – including primordial energy, consciousness, astral worlds and whatnot – so that only what cannot be experienced is left, namely the formlessness oneness.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Suppose you do not believe thoughts are real. In that case, it is easy to welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One because all that is needed to do that is not to be attentive to the apparent meaning of thoughts. This is not the same as stopping them. Doing something enhances the belief in being someone specific – and being that requires lots of thoughts with a specific meaning.

Neither should it be understood as you become aware of the Enlightenment of that which is One instead of thoughts. It is impossible to be conscious of the Enlightenment of that which is One, as it takes more than one to be aware of something.

For the same reason, you are not in the Enlightenment of that which is One anymore if you return to a world where there seems to be more than one, and the person you appear to has not been changed or transformed. Yet, there are vague memories of nothing being moved into that which is one, so you are to be compared to someone who is the Enlightenment of that which is One.

If someone only partially bids welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One, one will have glimpses of it. Maybe spaced-out visions of travelling through different universes, seeing Jesus or the birth of a new universe in slow motion, which is very exciting, of course. Still, it is something experienced, so it has nothing to do with the Enlightenment of that which is One. Neither if you hear, feel, nor taste it.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Nobody will know if you have bid welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One. Knowing it requires more than one, thus overlooking the Enlightenment of that which is One.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The visual aspect of having glimpses of enlightenment can for example reveal the birth of a universe.The graphic is grabbed from the web.

The visual aspect of having glimpses of Enlightenment can, for example, reveal the birth of a universe. However, it will neither be experienced as if it is outside or inside but nowhere and everywhere. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

The world is nothing but a construction of thoughts that seem to have the power to hide that which is One when you perceive them to be something specific.

Thus you may conclude it is best to stop thoughts. But they are not what hide the Enlightenment of that which is One. Instead, it is a belief that they establish you as someone.

Correcting that is not about doing something but about not doing what you do to hide the bright, white light, namely taking thoughts seriously. By not doing that, the belief in them as yours cannot be maintained. Therefore, since you are nobody, you automatically welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One. That said, if there is still the slightest belief in being someone, you will not want to be sucked into a black hole and as nothing descend into that which is one. Chances are you right away will return to the world constructed of thoughts because you still cherish one or more of them.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The Enlightenment of that which is One is an invitation to pass through a hole so narrow that only nothing can pass into a void with no time and space. The spot seems black until a light brighter than anything else extracts all thoughts collected to fabricate an identity of someone and leave them at the edge of the black hole, so there is not something definable to gracefully float into the formlessness of oneness. In other words, nothing is joining that which is One. The reason for this is that you have never left it. That is impossible because there is nothing outside of oneness since it is formless, thus endless.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Falling through a black hole into that which is one can be compared to falling in love in the sense that nobody is falling. It is as if you are without weight or substance and forever float through an empty void with no beginning and end. Yet it has an end, namely in the formlessness of that which is One. But the moment it ends, it starts because oneness is one perpetual present.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

When you see all thoughts as a symbol of the bright white light, their apparent differences in time and space do not make a difference. Thus there is no separation to hide that which is One.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

This is a graphic simulation o the black hole, where you are sucked in by an explosion of light, if you do not insist in seeing forms. If you are willing to be burned up by the pure bright light, there is no one to see – neither nothing to see. All there is, is that which is.

This is a graphic simulation of the black hole, where the thought construction that holds you together as if you are someone tangible is left at its edge, so what is not definable is sucked through the black hole by a highly intense light into that which is One. That is, if you do not insist on seeing something definable in the light and are willing to be burned away by it. If so, the last thing you see is a black hole, and then you are no more. You never were because it takes more than one to be someone, and there is no more than that which is One. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

To bid welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One, all you need to do is stop focusing on experiencing something tangible. If you believe in seeing something definable, it seems to hide the formlessness of oneness.

It is neither light nor darkness or anything in between. But light is used to extract all the thoughts used to make up the experience of being someone tangible, so there is not something to be sucked into a black hole and spit out on the other side into that which is One. However, there is no other side because there is no more than that which is One. Therefore, this explanation only makes sense as long as you believe in a world where there seems to be more than one.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

It is not uncommon to bid welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One and afterwards dismisses the vague memories as nothing because what is formless, thus not definable, cannot be remembered as something. In other words, since the Enlightenment of that which is One cannot be shared in a world where there seems to be more than one, it is often dismissed as real.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The Enlightenment of that which is One does not bring you back to the formlessness of oneness. It is impossible. That which is you is no different from that which is One, and since it is formless, thus endless, there is nothing outside of it. Consequently, you have never been left – only in fantasy.

The Enlightenment of that which is One does not change this imagination but heals the sick belief that it is real. Rebooted as someone definitive in a world where there seems to be more than one, you sense this very clearly because even though the memories of the Enlightenment of that which is One are vague, one thing stands out crystal clear: There is no more than that which is One.

So if you are looking for something big and supernatural that will support you and help you to become more spiritual, you will do everything to fend off the Enlightenment of that which is One because it has none of those qualities you are looking for. It does not have anything since it requires more than one to have something.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

When you accept your life is not rational, you do not look for coherence. Thus not understanding the Enlightenment of that which is One does not frighten you, and you happily forget to make sense of it, wherefore no meaning hides that which is.


NOTES:

CANCELLEX Being and seeing something is not real, nor is dying

Updated May 17, 2022

CANCELLEX Not something, neither nothing but that which is everything, namely oneness

Updated September 12, 2022

CANCELLEX How to sense the oneness of life in a world where there seems to be more than one

Updated May 17, 2022

Made-up states of satisfaction

Updated September 20, 2022

Someone in Spain recently had the heart replaced by the above heart made of plastic. In other words, a heart is not you, but solely a mechanic thing you have to pump the blood around. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

The heart is not you. That is why it is called your heart. It is a tool needed for pumping blood around the body to supply its cells with oxygen. In other words, coming from the heart merely means going with oxygen. Since this is purely mechanical, the heart can be replaced with plastic, like in the above image. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

COMING FROM THE HEART IS A HEAD TRIP
It seems that to be spiritual, you must come from the heart and manifest it as if you are part of something bigger, for example, by joining a group of like-minded ones.

Unfortunately, most of these groups of supposedly warm-hearted people only tolerate ways of expression endorsed by their guru, so if you do not follow the dress code, you are excluded. You will probably also be abandoned if you are well organised and do not mind planning because it scares those who space out by hugging others in the group.

However, not making plans does not seem to be a problem for most who believe in coming from the heart. They need to be so unique and independent that it is impossible to commit to a plan, least of all to the conventional rules of society.

Those believing to come from the heart restricts themselves by their rules of how to express it. But they deny that by projecting their control onto the world. Therefore, since the world seems to have caused their feeling of imprisonment, they conclude they will be free when the rules of the world have been changed.

That is why the world must be changed into something that suits their needs. However, they hide this selfishness behind talk about unity when they meet in chaotic events, often advertised very confusingly because they think clarity and direction restrict the heart.


No matter where an experience is perceived to come from or if it appears spiritual or mundane, it is fabricated by the brain. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

The heart is a muscle from where blood transports oxygen to the cells of the body. If you also have an experience of something spiritual coming from it, you are deceiving yourself. Science discovered more than 200 years ago, that all experiences comes are fabricated by the brain.

Since intuition and spontaneity seems associated with non-duality, those claiming to come from the heart think they are in touch with non-duality. But since intuition is defined by reasoning and spontaneity by planning, and reasoning and planning have been excluded, intuition and spontaneity cannot be described. Thus coming from the heart does not result in a genuine experience but a thought-up state of satisfaction based on separation.

In a world of duality, non-duality seems to be separated into two opposing parts, one as someone definitive and another one as multiple appearances outside of it.

But the concept of coming from the heart is misleading. It implies there is a way to unite those opposing parts, thus increasing the belief in separation, since there would be no idea of union without this separation.

It is not easy to undo a belief you are unaware of. So if you want to undo the belief in duality, do not try to escape it by following rosy ideas like coming from the heart. Instead, include the apparent horror of duality as well as its beauty. Since that cancels them out, there is no contrast to define a world of duality, wherefore nothing seems to hide there is nothing other than non-duality.

A perfect body cannot be felt because there is no such thing. Yet the feeling of not being perfect can be felt. And since that frustration is the means to feel you are someone definitive, it serves you well feeling frustrated about not being perfect. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

THE PERFECT BODY IS A MENTAL CONSTRUCTION:
Movies use collectively agreed concepts of right or wrong to create moods that we seem to recognise. But what we assume the film makes us feel is based on thoughts popping up from the past about what we believe is right and wrong. Therefore, if you check what you actually feel, you are, in most cases, not touched by the movie. It is something you imagine. The same applies to being attracted by a particular body type.

You wish that you feel something when seeing, what you judge to be a perfect body, but you do not feel anything because the idea of an ideal body is a thought construction of a body from which the parts judged not as perfect are excluded. Thus you invite to dinner with red wine, candlelights and whatnot that create an atmosphere as if you feel something special.

To not see your self-deception, you establish rules of how to interact so you can hide, you have no feelings invested in the actual body of the other – only in your imagination of what you can do with the fragments of the body judged as perfect. The same applies if you are attracted to a specific type of personality.

If you are accused of being shallow in such a relationship, you prove your commitment to it by pointing to the rules you strictly follow. Yet it is nothing but a construction of thoughts used to avoid real intimacy, as, in closeness, the belief in separation will go down the drain so that there is nothing to hide, there is no more than the intimacy of that which is One.

Read more about made-up feelings in You must play the game of duality to hack it.

Trying to be centred is often a way to fence off what you judge as wrong so that it seems you have a good and not a bad experience. But to experience goodness only is to separate, so it will not feel good. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

BEING CENTRED IS SPECULATIVE:
If you do not want the belief in a world where there seems to be more than one to hide the formlessness of oneness, it is not desirable to be centred because. It requires much control to continuously exclude what is not as unbalanced, and since excluding is to separate, the belief in a world where there seems to be more than one is enhanced instead of undone.

That said, if you have worked hard to separate specific parts of the world from the image you have made of yourself so that it appears to be a story of a good person in a bad world, you do not need to do anything about that. It happens by itself when the need to separate is included.

Everything in a world where there seems to be more than one needs contrast to be experienced as something specific. Hence you can only experience being separated if you also – consciously or not – experience being connected. And as the sum of the two opposites always is a state of not-knowing, that is what you get if you do not keep separation and connection apart. However, this state is not a sensation like falling in love but the bliss of nothing.


NOTE: This article is part of hack #3.1 Inclusiveness is freedom.

NT4 Inclusiveness cancels out the need to be someone definitive [draft]

Updated September 4, 2022

No matter how beautiful something is defined, it confirms separation, thus making you suffer. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

Those defining themselves as vegetarians believe it is better not to eat meat. From this, we can derive that being someone definitive is not a fact but a belief based on excluding something specific.

However, this belief cannot be hacked by meditation because it is about denying specific parts of yourself. But, on the other hand, if you are all-inclusive, there is nothing to define what and where you are. Thus you are in a state of not-knowing, having the bliss of nothing.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

You are defined by what you exclude from your perception of yourself. That is the way to be somebody definitive. For example, if you exclude what you judge as wrong, you appear good. On the other hand, inclusion does not turn you into anything at all, thus setting you free from the belief in separation.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Be happy each time you notice the same thoughts popping up again and again. It is probably thoughts you have excluded that beg to be included.

To include them is to be them, and to be them is to be confused and not know what is going on. In other words, not defining anything, everything is included, wherefore you enter a state of not-knowing where you, in the bliss of nothing, can have previews of non-duality.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

To exclude a feeling is not to be it, and to include it is to be it. Being it, you are not scared of it anymore.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

You do not include a feeling by understanding it but by being it. It is done by fully expressing it internally because it is within yourself you accuse somebody else of having caused what you feel. However, should you burst out in anger, do not stop but include it. The same applies if you feel embarrassed by your outburst.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The graphic is grabbed from the web.

You exclude what you want to hide from your personality by projecting it onto others so that you can be defined as better than them. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Every time you believe somebody is different from you, you exclude them, thus feeling alone. Yet, by not excluding, thus including, you feel alone together. See hack #7.1 Alone together, we go home.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

You must judge somebody as different from you to have compassion for them. Therefore, since compassion is an act of exclusion, it inflicts suffering.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Sometimes the fastest way to include feelings is to breathe through them. But as this may entail pain, it does not seem the easiest way. That is until the pain is included.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The main reason for being exclusive is that you will not appear mistaken. Being that must be avoided at any cost, so you are not reminded of your original mistake: to believe in separation.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Being inclusive instead of exclusive is not complicated. You do not have to do anything but stop excluding. However, if you are unaware of continuously excluding incorrect feelings, you cannot stop excluding them.

But when you realise that excluding something to appear correct is never-ending, you are ready to stop denying the parts you perceive as wrong in yourself. Hence you are all-inclusive, thus not glorifying separation anymore.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

You do not become happy by excluding what makes you sad but by including it because inclusiveness is happiness.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

When two sides of a contrast – for example positivity and negativity – are neither judged good nor bad, their apparent difference is not perceived to make a difference. Hence a world where there seems to be more than one appears so bland that its lifelessness is exposed.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

You are vulnerable when perceived as definable but not being describable, you are untouchable. The way to not be perceived as definite is not to exclude anything, thus including everything, because that leaves nothing to define you. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

To be in balance seems to be the goal for many seekers. But as nothing can be experienced without its contrast, you cannot experience balance without imbalance. Hence you, as always, seem torn apart by opposites. That is until you do not favour one of them but include them both as you perceive them.

When included, they are not divided. Hence there is no separation to uphold the belief in being someone definitive. Thus you are neither in balance nor imbalance but the bliss of nothing.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Since oneness is formless, a world where there seems to be more than one is a fantasy borne from the wish to be and have more than that which is One. The illusion unfolds by imagining it is possible to fragment oneness into opposites, such as good and bad, right and wrong, light and dark.

Therefore, if you consider yourself and like-minded the good ones and others the bad ones, you are enhancing the belief that oneness can be divided, thus making it appear as if life is separation and not oneness.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The inclusion of contrasting feelings is not the same as containing them. When the opposing sides of a contrast are included, they cancel out each other. Hence there is no feeling to have. See Without contrasts, there is nothing but non-duality.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

To follow an idea is to separate because it takes more than one to pursue something. Therefore, all opinions, spiritual and mundane, must be ignored if you want to have the belief in separation undone. Of course, that is also an idea. However, it is not based on exclusion but on inclusion. Thus it undoes all ideas.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

You are defined as someone definitive by what you exclude. So if not excluding, you are nothing but pure bliss.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Angry feelings often appear in sentences like »You are this and that …«. But if you change it into »I am this and that …«, it is much easier to include your anger. That is not meant to say you should stop blaming others. On the contrary, blaming them is the fastest way of exposing what you have banned in yourself. Read more about that here.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The graphic is grabbed from the web.

It requires much effort to be someone in a world where there seems to be more than one opportunity. However, none works out as expected, so you must keep looking for more. On the other hand, that which is one requires no effort, as there is no more than that possibility. Yet, it lasts forever because it is formless, thus endless. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

The only thing that feels worse than not getting what you want is getting it because the hunger for more is unresolved.

You can never be satisfied in a world where there seems to be more than one because the reason for being there is to be and have more. That is why it is impossible to stop looking for more. However, if you do not perceive the apparent differences to make a difference, nobody looks for more.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Since more or less everybody is exhausted from constantly craving more, they look for more relaxation through mindfulness, yoga and whatnot to get more energy for chasing more love, more peace, more authenticity, more friends, more money, or more power. They especially need more control, so they can manipulate more people into helping them to get more.

As soon as they stop believing, it is possible to be or have more than that which is one, it does not appear hidden anymore.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Oneness has a built-in safeguard mode. It starts simulating a world where there seems to be more than one if you believe to be separated from that which is one. Thus you do not have to feel lonesome while having this belief.

The simulation turns off the moment you stop believing it is possible to be and have more than that which is one.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

When a drug addict has finished rehab, the reward is not a new and better tripping experience but freedom from enslavement. Likewise, the prize of stopping your ongoing fix of duality is not a higher and more exciting experience but freedom from experiencing something, as non-duality is that which is one, and it takes more than one to be aware of anything.

You do not even know you once believed to be in a world of duality because there is no such thing. Neither do you know that you are in non-duality, as that requires more than one. No worries. You do not need to know anything because non-duality is everything since it is formless, thus endless.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

If the contrasts that seem to define you are dissolved, you are free from being defined as someone definitive. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen

No reason to change your name, clothes or anything else. Nor do you not have to think positive, become vegan or stop being it. Everything in a world where there seems to be more than one is equally illusionary. Fortunately, Alexius’ Duality Hacks can use any illusion to undo the belief that it is real.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Since your experience of the present is shaped by the past, the inclusion of a present experience undoes the past as well, thus also the definition of you. So next time somebody reminds you of the past, there is nobody to be upset about that.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

No need to wonder if hidden feelings from the past have been left out when you include what you appear to be in the present moment because that is the sum of the past. You do not have to worry if everything in the present moment is fully included. Willingness to do so is all that is required.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Meditation is not needed to stop thoughts when nobody has them.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

If the apparent difference in the person’s height is not perceived to make a difference, you are neither defined as small nor tall.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The more the experienced differences are not perceived to make a difference, the less separation is confirmed. Therefore, since its outcome, suffering, does not need to be avoided, it is easy to appear as someone in a world where there seems to be more than one.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Knowing there is no more than that which is one, you are not afraid because it takes more than one to feel something.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Exclusiveness is the foundation of appearing to be someone definitive in a world of duality, as it favours one side of a contrast over the other, whereas inclusiveness cancels out the apparent difference in contrasts. Consequently you do not appear to be someone definitive but nobody and so the foundation for the belief in separation is gone. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

The foundation of your appearance as someone definitive in a world where there seems to be more than one is exclusiveness. First, one side of a contrast is judged better than the other. Second, the bad side is excluded by projecting it onto somebody, so you appear good at the expense of others. Fortunately, inclusiveness undoes this. It cancels out the apparent difference between contrasting elements. Thus, eventually, you do not appear to differ from others, which means the foundation for the belief in separation fades out. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

Appearing to be someone in a world where there seems to be more than one, you cannot always be happy. A feeling needs to be contrasted by its opposite to be experienced as something specific. For example, you would not know happiness if not for sadness.

The wish to have only one feeling comes from the memory of oneness. But it has been twisted because there are no feelings in oneness, as it takes more than one to feel something.

For the same reason, there are no contrasts in oneness. Yet, a world where there seems to be more than one cannot be experienced without them. In such a world, light requires darkness to be seen as something specific, peace needs war, positivity is coupled with negativity, and so on. Therefore, the more you include, the less there is to define your experiences as something specific. Eventually, there is nothing to experience, thus nothing to hide that which cannot be experienced, namely the formlessness of oneness.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Including something upsetting will not transform it but stop it from upsetting you. You do not even know what is not upsetting you anymore. The memory of it is gone. So if you, for example, want to forget your ex, you include unedited memories of the relationship.

To include the memories of rejection is to be them. That means they cannot be contrasted and thus not defined. Consequently, you are not someone who has been rejected. From this follows that inclusion does not establish you as someone definitive but as nothing.

Therefore, you must keep excluding something if you want to be someone in the world because what you exclude is what defines you as someone definitive. But you cannot be exclusive without cherishing the belief in separation, which is the cause of loneliness. And since there is no loneliness in oneness, it seems hidden until you include being exclusive.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Since the experience of a world defined by time and space is based on exclusion, the obvious way to undo it is to be inclusive. However, this is not done by avoiding being exclusive. That is not inclusive.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The belief that it is possible to be and have more than that which is one is based on exclusion, so when exclusion is included, the belief is undone.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Including everything does not mean you must include something you do not like, but that you include you dislike it.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

You are defined by what you judge yourself not to be. In other words, you do not want peace in the world because you need the bad guys to contrast the image you have made of yourself as one of the good ones doing the right thing.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

When there is no need to be validated as someone definitive, it does not matter if others seem to induce feelings of sadness or happiness because there is nobody to pick them up.


NOTE: This article is part of hack #3.1 Inclusiveness is freedom.

Inclusion is liberation from separation (in the process of being updated)

Updated August 24, 2022

CANCELLEX DEFOCUS Concentration is suppressing that which is you

Updated August 31, 2022

CANCELLEX Those looking for peace are full of shit

Updated August 24, 2022

CANCELLEX Free to be no more than that which is One

Updated May 17, 2022

Duality is a simulated reality on top of non-duality

Updated September 9, 2022

simulated_universe_1372282700_600x275

There is not anything real or unreal because non-duality is that which is One, and it takes more than one to be real or anything else. The image is grabbed from the movie The Thirteenth Floor.

A world of duality is a simulated reality layered on top of non-duality to hide there is no more than non-duality because it is formless, thus endless. However, an illusion cannot hide anything. Hence it is rather the belief that you are someone definitive in a world of duality that appears to conceal the formlessness of non-duality.

Eyes do not see. It is the brain, that fabricate the images, you believe to ‘see.’ Actually, the brain can produce perfect images of the world with your eyes closed. The brain cheats you. But it is only possible because you want to be deceived.

It seems to establish duality as genuine when you divide it into real and unreal. However, in an illusion, everything is artificial. The light from the sun and a bulb are equally fake, and a flower blossoming is not more genuine than a plastic flower. Whether love is perceived as pure or unconditional, it is not real – neither is loss, abundance, ego, mind, soul, consciousness, truth, god, angels, spiritual beings or astral planes. Not even non-duality is real because it is that which is One, and it takes more than to be something.

Wavelengthsof lightcan be comparedto binary data,that is accumulatingthe simulation,of the webpage,you seem to seeon your screen now.Wavelengths haveno form, coloror depth of filed,as it seemsin this pic simulatingwavelengthsand binary data.

Wavelengths of light can be compared to the binary data, that accumulate the simulation of the webpage, you assume to see on your screen right now with words, seeming to form a meaning, and images with colours, that appear to reflect the world where you believe to be. But binary data or wavelengths do not have the form, colours or depth of field, that you believe to experience on this page. And they do not know, they are twisted in such a way, that you think there is a dimensional world with lots of different appearances in this image.

We believe to see colourful images of a tangible world as it occurs now, regardless all wavelengths of light hitting our retina are colourless and formless, and the motion of the image we believe to see has been extrapolated by the brain, so that the time delay in processing the data does not interfere with the events we perceive to happen now.

You are not seeing,what you seem to see.It is an illusion.

What you believe to see is not there. It is a mirage fabricated by thoughts that also are unreal since reality is that which is One, and it takes more than one to have thoughts.

TO KNOW IS TO BELIEVE IN DUALITY
Even within the phoney reality of duality, this page you believe to see on electronic media is an illusion. It is not in your media. An app has translated HTML code on servers far from you into something recognisable. In other words, what you think you see here is layered on code far from you. If your web browser had not rewritten it, you would not see this article about simulated reality.

The digital photos you perceive to see are layered on top of digital info that no human would perceive as an image of the world. A data converter has fabricated a layer on top of the digital information that triggers memories of the world as you remember it. In the case of the internet, this layer is a JPEG or PNG file.

The same applies to the words making up the article on your screen. It is a layer built on top of zeros and ones. But Alexius is not technically minded, so he cannot say he understands how it works – nor how the world of duality seems to work as a layer on top of non-duality.

Actually, metaphorically speaking, you are closer to that which is real, namely non-duality, if you do not understand how duality works because it does not work. How can it work when there is nothing but non-duality? It cannot! It is an illusion, thus not understandable.

The foolish one cannot separate good and bad or right from wrong. All is symbols of that which is life, and therefore all have the same cause – including you and him. So when he can see all is symbols of that which is life so can you, because life is that which you are a symbol of in the world.


The foolish one cannot separate right from wrong because everything definable is perceived as a symbol of non-duality. Hence their apparent difference makes no difference. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

Wise one can separate good and bad
Foolish one does not separate

Wise one knows the way to self
Foolish one has no self to know

Wise one knows the truth
Foolish one knows nothing

Foolish one is enlightened
Wise one is not

NOT-KNOWING IS THE UNDOING OF DUALITY
Since non-duality is oneness, and it takes more than one to know something, it is impossible to know what and where you are. Thus acknowledging this sets you free from the belief in duality.

You do not need help from Alexius or anybody else not to know what and where you are. Nor can anybody help you regarding that because nobody knows what and where they are. Some may act as if they know not to look foolish but wise.

A world of duality consists of contrast. One of the main ones is right versus wrong. So if you cannot separate right from wrong, the belief in duality fades out.

It can be helpful to read Alexius’ Duality Hacks to stop being ashamed of feeling foolish and, like Alexius, go with not knowing what and where you are. You are not instructed to follow specific steps to improve yourself but guided to foolishly forget what and where you believe in being, thus undoing the belief in duality. This occurs when your appearance as someone definitive is perceived as …

matrix-door

What you believe in being can be compared to code looking at a world of code.

Screen Shot 2014-12-09 at 09.45.21

This image is a screen dump of the code for the beginning of this article.

APPENDIX
This is a screen dump of the source code behind the first part of this article. In the source code, you cannot see the header, the colours, photos or anything else you experience to see now. The code, which is nothing but letters and numbers added together sometime in the past, commands your browser to fabricate this page when you write the name for its particular code. Hereafter, you experience this article without noticing that it is an artificial layer fabricated on top of code.

Thoughts can be compared to code that the brain translates into the experience of duality. However, it is like seeing a mirage. It looks real, but there is nothing there. Nevertheless, in the below articles, you can find more detailed explanations of how a layer of duality is fabricated on top of non-duality:


NOTES:

What is unreal is right in front of you

Updated August 21, 2022

A world of duality can be compared to what comes out of the box in the Augmented Hand Series. When you stick your hand into it, an app changes the hand on the screen, and the brain fools you into feeling it happens to you.

DUALITY IS A SIMULATION:
Even though a fairy tale is built with elements from the physical world, there is nothing material in the tale. Everything is a simulation fabricated by a writer. The characters have no free will. They cannot leave the story and be part of the physical world because they are not physical but symbols of it.

A world of duality can be compared to a fairy tale. Nothing is real and never will be, whether you believe in living in the now, coming from the heart or whatnot. The Augmented Hand Series called Flong by Golan Levin and Collaborators illustrates this through interactive art.

In the Augmented Hand Series you can watch your hand take on a life of its own. Here your fingers grow to varying lengths.

In the Augmented Hand Series, you can watch your hand take on a life of its own. Here your fingers grow to varying lengths.

When you stick your hand in a small box – see the above animation – you see it moving on a screen beyond your control. Instead, the hand is controlled by a preprogrammed app to change the length of your fingers.

The small box and the screen on top create a disconnect between what the eye sees, the body feels and the brain processes. Some even look into the box to check if what they see on the screen happens to their hand because, even though the hand on the screen is not part of them, the brain tells them to believe it is.

It is impossible, but yet you feel it is happening.

These movements are not possible. Yet you feel it is happening to your hand – like you feel duality is happening, although it is impossible because non-duality is formless, thus endless.

Likewise, a world of duality is a simulation. Nothing happens in it. But it feels so because you, metaphorically speaking, have put non-duality in a small box, where an app called the brain twists it into a world of duality. Since it is an illusion, it is only the belief that it is real that needs to stop. You can do this by interpreting every experience of duality as a symbol of non-duality. Therefore, since your apparent different experiences do not seem to make a difference, there is no separation, thus no duality to distract you from non-duality.

THERE IS NO SELF:
Believing in being an individual in charge of its life can be compared to a machine that thinks it has a self, deciding what to do. There is no ‘I’, self, or soul in a machine. It is all mechanics, and even though the device may have been built with AI (artificial intelligence), it cannot think itself. All thoughts are preprogrammed possibilities. Nobody makes them, and nobody sees what the machine claims to see.

If you are visual-minded, you may have an Aha! moment seeing the below screen dumps from an article in Wired. They illustrate how a machine with AI ‘sees’ the world. It simply registers data or frequencies by how it is programmed. The captions are not from that article but from Alexius.

The machine has been programmed to perceive this point of frequency as cute, so it searches its database for an image to illustrate this.

The machine translates this point of frequency as eyes and concludes it sees the cute image that has been fabricated based on the info from its database.

Founded on past decisions, the machine reckons the cute image consists of a dog.

But it also seems to see a female. Thus it has to search its database to know if it is the female or the dog that is cute so that the appropriate feeling can be fabricated.


NOTES:

CANCELLEX Since it takes more than one to be somebody, there is nobody in oneness

Updated August 5, 2022

Perceiving everything as a symbol of that which is One will not change the world’s appearances. But since they all symbolise the same, their apparent difference makes no difference. Hence, believing in a world where there seems to be more than one makes no sense. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

Since a world where there seems to be more than one, according to Alexius’ Enlightened Non-Teachings, is make-believe, so is, of course, this statement. Nevertheless, you cannot appear in such a world without believing in something, so it is up to you what to believe.

Suppose it makes you feel good believing that a world where there seems to be more than one is an illusion. In that case, you could choose to see everything in that world as a symbol of oneness. Therefore, since nothing seems to make a difference, separation does not appear to hide that reality is which is One.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

That which is one is formless, thus endless. Hence it cannot know, you look for more in a world where there seems to be more than one. But no matter how much more you become or have, you feel limited because there is no more than that which is One. To overcome that, you may stop desiring to be and have more and become more pure and detached from the world. But this is just another variant of looking for more.

All you need to undo the desire for more is to change the purpose of your appearance in a world where there seems to be more than one. If it is to see everything as a symbol of oneness, differences make no difference. Thus it does not matter if you get more or not.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Anxiety is related to the wish for more. First, you are worried about not getting it. Second, when you achieve it, you fear losing it. However, if everything is perceived as a symbol of that which is One, you always have enough. This does not mean you cannot look forward to seeing your children, for example. But it means you are not attached to a specific outcome of your wish because it symbolises oneness, regardless of the outcome.

Should you be attached to the outcome, it is not a problem. Attachment is also a symbol of that which is One. Whatever you think, feel or do or not think, feel or do are symbols of that.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Since life is formless, thus without beginning and end, everything definable is lifeless. Therefore, you are not alive if you believe to be someone definitive. However, you symbolise the formlessness of life because, without it, you could not experience being something.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

You cannot choose to undo the belief in a world where there seems to be more than one because that confirms there is more than one. Fortunately, there is nothing to choose when you do not interpret your experiences as real but symbols of that which is real, namely oneness.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

static_film-projector

The projector of a movie is not in film protecting on a screen. And the world on the screen is not in the projector. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Everything in a world defined by time and space has an end. So neither love nor anything else will save you from dying. But what does not die is that which made it possible to create a fantasy of a world defined by time and space. In Alexius’ Duality Hacks this has many names, such as the formlessness of oneness, spirit, non-duality, life or that which is one. It is not in a world defined by time and space, though.

You can compare such a world to a movie and the formlessness of oneness to the projector. The movie projector is not in the projected, and the way you perceive that is not in the projector. It does not know how you perceive what it projects – and it could not care less because what it projects is not real. This does not mean you should renounce the world you seem to experience. On the contrary, you can love or hate anything in the world, as you feel like. It does not matter because what you see is not there.

What matters, though, is that you do not hang onto love or anything else in the world where you experience being. If you do, you will take up imagined space when, so there is no room for you in oneness since it is spaceless.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

from-film-projector

In the context of the movie metaphor, the Enlightenment of that which is One can be compared to unfiltered light coming from the projector. No world is to be seen – and that is why one who is to be compared to the Enlightenment of that which is One knows, everything that appears to have a form is fake. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Nobody expects a movie projector to be in the world it projects on a screen because neither that nor anything else physical can be part of a virtual world.

In other words, the world of a movie is not a manifestation of the physical world, and though it is experienced due to the projector, it cannot be experienced in it, nor has it any power to change it. All the projector can do is project what is added in front of it.

Anything can seem real in an illusion. It is a matter of believe.

When perceiving everything as a symbol of that which makes it possible to experience something, it does not matter what it appears to be. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Believing to be someone in a world defined by time and space can be compared to experiencing you are part of a movie world. Though oneness is used to project this fantasy of a world defined by time and space, it does not know it. Nor does it know that you believe to be in it rather than oneness because you prefer the excitement of more than one over the peace of that which is One. Nor does it know what you believe in having a beginning and end. It does not know of time but sees the reel with the movie as a whole, wherefore everything happens simultaneously. See What time is!?

Therefore, in the context of the movie metaphor, if you are not identified with the projected but with what is projecting it, nothing changes when the movie is over because the projector is still there, as it also was while it appeared to cast a film of a world defined by time and space. One way of not identifying with the projected is to perceive it as a symbol of that which generates it, namely the projector.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Screen Shot 2015-04-24 at 14.06.31

This is where a movie in a cinema comes from – at least in the days of analogue film – and as you can see, it has nothing to do with the world that appears to be on the screen. Also, it is much smaller than the world experienced to be on the screen. The same applies to that which is One, which is so much smaller than a world where there seems to be more than one. It is, actually, so small that it cannot be seen. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Some may respond to the above movie metaphor with the question: »Who has put the film in the projector?« They think that this question proves the movie is real.

Thoughts does not prove anything.

The graphic is grabbed from the web.

But nothing proves a world defined by time and space is real. There are silly explanations about an almighty god, an explosion of nothing coming out of a black hole as something, ‘I think therefore I am,’ or naive beliefs like ‘I exist because I can feel pain when I pitch the body.’ The latter would be the same as saying, I am the coat I wear because I can feel something when I pitch it. But you are not your coat or body, nor soul or consciousness. That is why you say my coat, body, soul and consciousness.

You are not anything at all because it takes more than one to be something, and there is no more than that which is One.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Alexius’ Duality Hacks can be compared to a piece of soap. It has no power to do anything by itself – only in the hands of someone does it become useful. Likewise, when applied hack #2.1 Everything experienced is a symbol of oneness, effectively washes away all your beliefs. If you do not like the smell of this soap, by all means, use Duality Hacks with a flavour you like.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Alexius’ Enlightened Non-Teachings are like fairy tales that you read for stray kids to shed some light on what and where they are, so they can find the way home.


NOTE:  This article is part of hack #2.1 Everything experienced is a symbol of oneness