Where do Alexius’ Duality Hacks come from

Updated June 16, 2022

Since Alexius hardly has read any scriptures or so-called spiritual books, Alexius’ Enlightened Non-Teachings are not based on an existing religion or philosophy, nor are they meant to be a new religion or philosophy but to undo the belief in such concepts as well as anything else. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Hack #1-4 and #7 (see Alexius’ Duality Hacks) are deduced from Alexius’ ways of appearing as someone in a world where there seems to be more than one. The way to connect with the empty breath is deduced from his connection with it. Alexius did not initially connect with it, as he advises in his non-teachings. Instead, the empty breath was given to him. Maybe so he could deduce a way for you to connect with it.

Check out hack #5.2 Uncontrolled speed leads to a state of not-knowing, if you want to connect with the empty breath.

The way to hear or feel the vibration that Aum, Sohang, and The Word of God symbolise, as described in the previous article The four aspects of Enlightenment and how to sample them and especially in Life has no secrets, is deduced from Alexius’ experience of hearing and feeling it. He started to hear and feel this echo of oneness in his youth. However, it was not by Aum or Sohang but by devotion.

Still, it was not before much later he realised that hearing or feeling this echo of oneness is what those who constantly chant Aum or Sohang are looking for but never find because they expect something extraordinary. Yet having recognised it himself, it was not a problem to deduce a fast way of hearing or feeling the unpronounceable vibration that Aum or Sohang symbolises.

The ways to have glimpses of the Enlightenment of that which is One in the form of light, music and nectar as described in the previous article The four aspects of Enlightenment and how to sample them, Alexius heard about it in his youth. But most likely, the speaker only had second-hand knowledge of it because he mainly referred to ancient scriptures and not personal experiences.

A guru, which means a teacher, is always deeply founded in the belief of being someone special in a world, where there seems to be more than one, because it requires more than one to teach somebody. In other words, a guru is no different from anybody else profiting on the belief that it is possible to be and have more than that which is one.

Guru is a Hindi word for teacher, and as such, it is deeply founded in the belief of being in a world where there seems to be more than one because it requires more than one to teach something. In other words, a guru is no different from anybody else, profiting from the belief that it is possible to be and have more than that which is One. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Anyhow Alexius soon had so many visions of light that he forgot to differentiate them. Thus he quickly bid welcome the Enlightenment of that which is One (see hack #6.1 The Enlightenment of that which is One). But he cannot offer a technique for this other than forgetting what and where you appear to be, so there is nothing definable to block it out. But since it takes more than one to share something, the Enlightenment of that which is On cannot be communicated. On the other hand, glimpses of it are experienced by somebody, so they can be shared. And since Alexius experience them continually, his guidance about them is not based on second-hand knowledge. Consequently, they may not be similar to what you hear from those interpreting old scriptures because, without the Enlightened of that which is One, you are bound to misinterpret them.

As most seem to think Enlightenment is something you achieve, where after you are an Enlightened, amazing person, it may be best to spell out that the Enlightenment of that which is One cannot be achieved by anybody because to bid it welcome, you must be nobody. In other words, Alexius has not been Enlightened but momentarily stepped aside so that there was nothing but light sucking him into the formlessness of oneness through a black hole. That is why he is to be compared to the Enlightenment of that which is One.

Most gurus do not talk about the Enlightenment of that which is One, but glimpses of it that they  experience while remaining conscious of being someone definitive. They often consider such experiences to come from the pineal gland. But the Enlightenment of that which is One, does not come from anywhere. That is why you must forget what and where you are to bid it welcome.

Unfortunately, this does not apply to most others talking about Enlightenment. What they say about it is not geared toward bidding it welcome but fending it off so they can become unique in the eyes of the world. This worldly purpose they hide behind vague and mysterious stories about a better world, coming from the heart and whatnot.

The old-school gurus may speak hazily about kundalini, which is supposed to make a fusion between body and spirit so that you become full of bliss and wisdom. Newer gurus have speculative teachings about living in the now, realising the self or a higher purpose. Both approaches appeal to those who want their feelings of inferiority replaced with feelings of spiritual grandeur, so they seem acknowledged as someone special part of something higher.

Most belief systems are just a shared vocabulary for people feeling inferior, so they can hide their misery by sharing this vocabulary with like-minded ones. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

But it requires more than one to merge with something, be full of light, live in the now, and realise the self. In other words, it is an experience geared toward a world where there seems to be more than one and has nothing to do with that which is One.

Any experience in a world where there seems to be more than one can turn into that which is One, provided you do not try to hold onto the experience as something specific. It is only possible when you believe to be someone definitive there is no room for anything definitive in the formlessness of oneness

The same applies to seeing, hearing, feeling or tasting glimpses of the Enlightenment of that which is One. That is why Alexius’ Enlightened Non-Teachings distinguish between the Enlightenment of that which is One and glimpses of it. The latter is, as already said, an experience or a state of being, thus part of a world where there seems to be more than one. But the Enlightenment of that which is One is not an experience, nor any being, because it takes more than one to experience or be something. In other words, it is not part of a world where there seems to be more than one. On the contrary, it erases all memories of this fantasy.

All ways lead to Rome, they say, but they forget to say that they also lead away from it. So do not count on the ways suggested by the gurus promising a hypothetical better life in the future, because only a world where there seems to be more than one has a future. And as reality is one perpetual present, it has neither an end or a future, wherfore anything with a future is an illusion.

For those teaching about kundalini, freedom in the now, higher self and similar ideas, it does not seem to be a problem that no one ever gets what they promise. On the contrary, because it means their followers keep paying money, giving hugs or whatever the teacher asks for to make both of you feel it is possible to be and have more than that which is One.

Yet, this is not what Alexius’ Duality Hacks are about. They point to the formlessness of oneness – or rather towards that which appears to hide, there never was and never will be more than that which is One.


NOTE: This article is a nota bene to the previous one The four aspects of Enlightenment and how to sample them. They are both parts of hack #6.3 The inward-facing senses, Enlightenment and glimpses of it.